A Proof Calculus Which Reduces Syntactic Bureaucracy
نویسندگان
چکیده
In usual proof systems, like the sequent calculus, only a very limited way of combining proofs is available through the tree structure. We present in this paper a logicindependent proof calculus, where proofs can be freely composed by connectives, and prove its basic properties. The main advantage of this proof calculus is that it allows to avoid certain types of syntactic bureaucracy inherent to all usual proof systems, in particular the sequent calculus. Proofs in this system closely reflect their atomic flow, which traces the behaviour of atoms through structural rules. The general definition is illustrated by the standard deep-inference system for propositional logic, for which there are known rewriting techniques that achieve cut elimination based only on the information in atomic flows.
منابع مشابه
Classical Logic = Fibred MLL
Syntactically, classical logic decomposes thus [Gir87]: Classical logic = MLL + Superposition where MLL is Multiplicative Linear Logic, and superposition means contraction (binary case) and weakening (nullary case). Proof nets for classical logic have been proposed [Gir91, Rob03], containing explicit contraction and weakening nodes. Just as the logical sequent rules of conjuction (tensor) and d...
متن کاملm at h . L O / 0 50 40 28 v 1 1 A pr 2 00 5 Classical logic = Fibred MLL
Syntactically, classical logic decomposes thus [Gir87]: Classical logic = MLL + Superposition where MLL is Multiplicative Linear Logic, and superposition means contraction (binary case) and weakening (nullary case). Proof nets for classical logic have been proposed [Gir91, Rob03], containing explicit contraction and weakening nodes. Just as the logical sequent rules of conjuction (tensor) and d...
متن کاملFrom Deep Inference to Proof Nets
This paper shows how derivations in (a variation of) SKS can be translated into proof nets. Since an SKS derivation contains more information about a proof than the corresponding proof net, we observe a loss of information which can be understood as “eliminating bureaucracy”. Technically this is achieved by cut reduction on proof nets. As an intermediate step between the two extremes, SKS deriv...
متن کاملFrom Deep Inference to Proof Nets via Cut Elimination
This paper shows how derivations in the deep inference system SKS for classical propositional logic can be translated into proof nets. Since an SKS derivation contains more information about a proof than the corresponding proof net, we observe a loss of information which can be understood as “eliminating bureaucracy”. Technically this is achieved by cut reduction on proof nets. As an intermedia...
متن کاملCanonical Sequent Proofs via Multi-Focusing
The sequent calculus admits many proofs of the same conclusion that differ only by trivial permutations of inference rules. In order to eliminate this “bureaucracy” from sequent proofs, deductive formalisms such as proof nets or natural deduction are usually used instead of the sequent calculus, for they identify proofs more abstractly and geometrically. In this paper we recover permutative can...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
عنوان ژورنال:
دوره شماره
صفحات -
تاریخ انتشار 2010